Pages

Showing posts with label front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Show all posts

November 27, 2013

De invloed van calorie- en beweeginformatie op hoeveel je eet: Noraly Duizer's presentatie tijdens Student Research Conference


 Afgelopen week had Noraly Duizer de eer om haar bachelor thesis te presenteren tijdens de Student Research Conference (SRC) te Amsterdam. Op de SRC presenteren geselecteerde studenten hun bacheloronderzoek. Hoewel Noraly niet in de prijzen viel ging haar presentatie erg goed.
 
Afgelopen voorjaar gaf Noraly aan 148 deelnemers een portie chips met daarbij op de verpakking gemanipuleerde informatie over het aantal calorieen in een portie en hoe lang je moet sporten om deze calorieen te verbranden. Heeft deze informatie invloed op hoeveel mensen eten en hun concrete sportplannen? Maakt het de chips juist lekkerder en het schuldgevoel na het eten groter? Lees het in de paper van Noraly hieronder!
 
 

January 21, 2013

Clymbol website is officially launched

Clymbol is a EU-funded research project that runs from 2012 till 2016. Today, the CLYMBOL website went online.

Here in Wageningen, we particularly focus on purchase and consumption effects of health information at food packages (see previous blog post). We just started several interesting student thesis projects on this fascinating topic.

Hopefully, Lanqi, Eva, and Janna can add the results of their projects to the site the coming year. We keep you updated!

CLYMBOL - consumer research on health-related symbols and claims

October 01, 2012

Can health claims and symbols lead to healthier eating patterns? - CLYMBOL project has started

Last week, we had a kick-off meeting of Clymbol in Brussels. This is an EU-funded project to find out what really happens inside consumer minds regarding health claims and symbols at food packages.

At Wageningen University, we studied this topic before (see earlier posts about nutrition logos and eye tracking research). Now we will particularly focus on the purchase and consumption effects on health and nutrition information at food package.

We keep you updated about new study results!

This is the official press release:

A new EU funded (FP7) project kicks off today aiming to shed light on how consumers interpret health information on food labels, and how this affects their purchasing and consumption behaviour.
CLYMBOL (‘Role of health-related claims and symbols in consumer behaviour’) is a four year research project that will provide insights into consumer understanding and behaviour related to health information. Guidelines will be developed to evaluate the effects of health information on food labels.

The issue
Health claims are messages on food packages that state, suggest or imply a relationship between a certain food product (or one of its constituents) and health. ‘Vitamin A helps the proper functioning of the immune system’, is an example. Health symbols are awarded to food products which meet certain nutrient requirements and constitute the healthiest option within a product category (e.g. Choices logo, Swedish Keyhole).

A snack with visible front of pack logo and calorie info
“Health claims and symbols are aids to help consumers identify foods that are healthier options, but we know little on how they impact consumer behaviour”, says Prof Dr Klaus G. Grunert, partner in, and scientific advisor to, the CLYMBOL project.

The acceptance of food products with health information is influenced by many different factors. Familiarity with the product, health claim or functional ingredient used plus personal relevance appear as the most important determinants. But what is the actual effect of health information on consumer behaviour regarding food choices?

The research
CLYMBOL aims to understand better the effects of health information on purchase and consumption patterns. The CLYMBOL team will create a set of methodologies to measure the role of health claims and symbols in consumer behaviour, drawing on the latest developments in cognitive and behavioural science. The range of studies includes pan-European surveys, experiments in actual supermarkets and analysis of population data. By measuring consumers’ eye movements and reaction times, for example, researchers will be able to observe and analyse subconscious behaviour and link this to actual purchases. CLYMBOL will also develop guidelines directed towards health claims and symbols, taking into account the differences between consumers and EU member states.

The consortium
The CLYMBOL consortium gathers 14 partners from 9 countries who have proven outstanding expertise in various fields: cognitive consumer psychology, economics, marketing, nutrition and public health. A retailer is also part of the group, ensuring that the research can be carried out in real-life settings.
  • Aarhus University (Denmark) – Scientific Advisor
  • Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragon, CITA (Spain)
  • Corvinus University Budapest (Hungary)
  • European Food Information Council (Belgium) – Coordinator
  • Ghent University (Belgium)
  • Globus SB-Warenhaus Holding GmbH &Co. KG (Germany)
  • Saarland University (Germany)
  • Schuttelaar & Partners NV (Netherlands)
  • Swedish National Food Agency (Sweden)
  • University of Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • University of Oxford (UK)
  • University of Surrey (UK)
  • University of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
  • Wageningen University (The Netherlands)

January 30, 2012

A consumer perspective on the growing role of front-of-pack nutrition labelling


Wasa crackers with 'Ik Kies Bewust' (IKB)  logo

The future of front-of-pack nutrition labelling is still heavily debated. These small-sized nutrition logos aim to make your healthy food choice more intuitive and simple. Examples include the Choices logo, Guiding Stars system, Traffic Light systems and Guidelines Daily Amounts (GDA) systems. 

Recently, a paper written by Hans Dagevos and myself was accepted for publication in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (click here for full-text preprint paper). The paper is inspired by our Dutch book 'Gezondheidslogo's op eten' we edited almost three years ago. We felt that although a lot of attention is devoted to the nutritional foundation of profile systems (e.g. which criteria to use), less attention is given to the consumer perspective in the development of these logos. More insight is needed in the psychological issues surrounding the current debates. For example, various misinterpretations may occur with nutrition labels (see table 2 in paper). One concern is that nutrition information on packages makes consumers vulnerable to halo effects. So, if it looks healthy, you can eat more.

Proponents believe that these logos promote healthier choices and stimulate innovation of the food industry. Unfortunately, little empirical evidence exist showing that these labels will actually lead to healthier food choices and less nutrition-related diseases. Opponents even warn that logos may confuse and mislead consumers. Particularly positive framed nutrition labels may act as a kind of 'good for you' messages.  

Let's end with some fresh good news from the front-of-pack nutrition logos field! A few days ago, Marion Nestle blogged about a recent study showing the positive effects of traffic light labels in a cafeteria setting. This intervention study, published in the American Journal of Public Health found that traffic light labels led to decreases in sales of red-labeled items and increases in sales of those with green labels. Results were most striking for beverage sales. Overall, this shows that front-of-pack logos can play a vital role as part of a broader basket of interventions that encourage consumers to improve their eating habits.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...